A dialogue in which an unnamed Visitor and young Socrates hunt, by successive definitions, for what true statesmanship is and how it differs from mere rule-following.
The Statesman continues the method of the Sophist: an unnamed philosophical Visitor from Elea leads young Socrates through a chain of definitions ('division') meant to isolate the true statesman from the many pretenders to his art -- shepherds of human flocks, merchants, generals, doctors, priests -- who share pieces of his function but not his knowledge. Along the way the Visitor tells a myth about a cosmic reversal in which the universe alternately spins under a god's guidance and is left to spin on its own, decaying until the god again takes hold of the tiller; the myth explains why humans in the present age must govern themselves rather than be shepherded directly by a god, and it sets up the central puzzle of the dialogue.
The core argument turns on a distinction between two kinds of measurement: measuring things merely against each other (bigger/smaller) and measuring them against a due standard, the mean or the fitting. True statesmanship, the Visitor argues, is not reducible to law -- laws are rigid generalizations, like a stubborn, ignorant man who cannot be argued with, whereas the genuine kingly art judges each situation and each soul on its merits. The dialogue's long central stretch works this out through the extended image of weaving: a good statesman is like a weaver who combines two naturally opposed temperaments, the courageous and the moderate, into a single well-woven fabric of the city, using education, marriage, and the exchange of pledges to keep either disposition from dominating and thereby preventing civil war.
The Statesman matters because it is Plato's most sustained attempt to describe the practical mechanics of good rule apart from the vision of the ideal city given in the Republic. It anticipates the more legalistic, second-best political theory of the Laws, treats law as a necessary but imperfect substitute for a wise ruler's judgment, and gives one of Plato's clearest statements of the idea that ruling well is itself a form of knowledge -- a craft with its own proper measure -- rather than a matter of birth, wealth, or popular consent.
“I mean the reversal of the sun's rising and setting, and of the other stars too: how the point from which the sun now rises was once the point where it set, and it used to rise from the opposite point”
— Statesman · read this chapter →
“Weaving is, in a way, a kind of interlacing.”
— Statesman · read this chapter →
“the art of measurement covers everything that comes to be, is in fact exactly what's just been said. For in a sense everything that falls under any art does partake of measurement”
— Statesman · read this chapter →
“We know that a thousand men who are top-notch at draughts would never measure up to the true experts found among the rest of the Greeks -- let alone kings.”
— Statesman · read this chapter →
“this is the one whole task of the kingly weaving -- never to allow the moderate characters to be separated from the courageous ones, but to weave them together by shared opinions, honors, dishonors, reputations, and by the exchange of pledges between them”
— Statesman · read this chapter →
It is a dialogue in which a Visitor from Elea and young Socrates try to define what a true statesman is, using a method of successive divisions to strip away rulers who only resemble the real thing. It ends with the image of the statesman as a weaver joining courageous and moderate citizens into one civic fabric.
He is an unnamed philosopher from Elea who also leads the companion dialogue the Sophist. In the Statesman he guides young Socrates -- not the famous Socrates, who mostly listens -- through the argument, playing the same role Socrates plays in other dialogues.
The Visitor argues that law is like a stubborn, ignorant man who cannot be reasoned with because it applies fixed rules to everyone, while the truly kingly art must judge each case and each soul individually. Law is treated as a necessary but imperfect stand-in for a genuinely wise ruler.
The Visitor tells of a universe that alternates between ages when a god actively steers it and ages when it is released to spin on its own, gradually running down. He uses this to explain why, in the present unsupervised age, human beings must govern themselves rather than being shepherded directly by a divine ruler.
Near the end, the true statesman is compared to a weaver who combines two opposed natural temperaments -- the courageous and the moderate -- into a single strong fabric, using shared education, honors, and intermarriage so that neither temperament comes to dominate and tear the city apart.
It sits between them: it keeps the Republic's claim that ruling is a form of expert knowledge rather than a matter of birth or consent, while moving toward the Laws' more realistic acceptance that written law is usually the best available substitute for an ideal ruler who is rarely, if ever, found.
Alcibiades 1 · Alcibiades 2 · Apology · Charmides · Cleitophon · Cratylus · Critias · Crito · Epinomis · Euthydemus · Euthyphro · Gorgias