A comic Platonic dialogue in which Socrates watches two sophist brothers use word-tricks to 'prove' absurdities, framing the case for real philosophy against verbal gamesmanship.
The Euthydemus is Plato's most overtly comic dialogue. Socrates tells his old friend Crito about a strange scene he witnessed at the Lyceum: two brothers, Euthydemus and Dionysodorus, itinerant teachers who claim to have perfected 'the art of virtue' after years of teaching fighting in armor and courtroom rhetoric. Socrates asks them to demonstrate their skill by turning a promising boy, Cleinias, toward philosophy. What follows alternates between two very different modes of argument: Socrates himself leads Cleinias through a sober, serious protreptic argument about wisdom, good fortune, and the correct use of goods, while the brothers repeatedly hijack the conversation with rapid-fire eristic tricks -- word-games that exploit ambiguity, equivocation, and the rules of Greek grammar to force absurd conclusions (that lying is impossible, that everyone already knows everything, that Socrates' father is a dog).
The dialogue's structure keeps swinging between these two poles. Socrates' own argument with Cleinias builds a genuine case: that happiness requires goods, that goods only benefit us if used with wisdom, and that therefore acquiring wisdom is the one thing worth pursuing above all else, more than wealth inherited from a father. Against this, Euthydemus and Dionysodorus perform a string of sophistical stunts on Ctesippus and then on Socrates himself, 'proving' that no one can ever be mistaken, that Socrates' father is not his father, and -- in the dialogue's most notorious bit -- that whatever a person is permitted to sell or give away is 'theirs,' therefore Socrates' family gods, being his, are his to sell.
The dialogue matters because it stages, in miniature, the distinction Plato wants readers to feel between philosophy and sophistry: not a difference of subtlety but of purpose. The brothers' tricks are clever and often genuinely funny, but they produce nothing -- no knowledge, no improvement in the listener. Socrates' plainer argument, though it collapses into puzzlement about what the beneficial 'kingly art' actually produces, is aimed at making Cleinias better. Crito's closing worry -- that his own son might be steered toward this kind of empty verbal cleverness instead of real philosophy -- gives the comedy a serious edge about education and what skills are actually worth cultivating.
“'Then you know everything,' I said, 'since you know even the smallest thing?' 'Everything,' he said, 'and you too, moreover, since if you know even one thing, you know everything.'”
— Euthydemus · read this chapter →
“wisdom makes people fortunate in every case; for surely wisdom could never err”
— Euthydemus · read this chapter →
“since you agree that Zeus and the other gods are yours, are you permitted to sell them, or give them away, or do whatever else you like with them, just as with your other property?”
— Euthydemus · read this chapter →
“in every pursuit the mediocre are many and worth nothing, while the serious ones are few and worth everything”
— Euthydemus · read this chapter →
It is a dialogue in which Socrates describes watching two sophist brothers, Euthydemus and Dionysodorus, use verbal tricks to 'prove' absurd claims, while he himself tries to lead a young man named Cleinias toward genuine philosophy. The contrast between empty word-games and sincere argument is the dialogue's central comedy and lesson.
They are brothers, former teachers of fighting in armor and courtroom speech, who now claim to teach virtue itself and to be able to refute any statement whatsoever using rapid, trick-laden questioning, known as eristic argument.
Socrates argues to Cleinias that having many good things (wealth, health, courage) is not enough for happiness -- those goods only benefit a person if used with wisdom, so wisdom is the one possession truly worth pursuing above all else.
Dionysodorus uses a chain of equivocations on words like 'yours' and 'different' to force Socrates into absurd admissions, including that his father is not his father and, in a related bit, that he shares fatherhood with a dog -- a parody of how eristic tricks can 'prove' anything by exploiting language rather than reasoning.
It draws a sharp line between sophistry, which produces clever-sounding but empty conclusions, and philosophy, which aims at actually improving the listener, using humor and formal parody to make the difference vivid rather than merely asserting it.
Alcibiades 1 · Alcibiades 2 · Apology · Charmides · Cleitophon · Cratylus · Critias · Crito · Epinomis · Euthyphro · Gorgias · Hipparchus