A Socratic dialogue that hunts for a single definition of "the beautiful" (to kalon) and fails, showing how hard the question really is.
Hippias Major stages a conversation between Socrates and Hippias of Elis, a wealthy and famous sophist who boasts of the huge fees he earns teaching young men across Greece. After Hippias describes a set-piece speech he plans to deliver on "fine pursuits," Socrates says an unnamed, insolent interlocutor recently stumped him with a simple question: what is the fine (or beautiful) itself? Socrates asks Hippias to help him find an answer sturdy enough to survive a second interrogation.
What follows is a chain of proposed definitions, each raised by Hippias and knocked down by Socrates playing devil's advocate for his absent questioner. A beautiful girl is offered first, then demolished by the observation that a beautiful mare, lyre, or even pot could equally be called fine, and that anything fine looks ugly next to something finer still (a callback to Heraclitus). Gold is proposed next and refuted by the counterexample of Pheidias's ivory-and-stone statue of Athena and a homely fig-wood porridge ladle that outperforms a golden one. The fitting is tried and rejected because it only makes things appear beautiful rather than actually be beautiful. The useful and the capable are tried and rejected because capability can just as easily produce something bad. The beneficial (the cause of good) is tried and undone by the logical point that a cause and its effect must be distinct things, so the beautiful cannot simply be identical with the good. Finally, pleasure through sight and hearing is proposed and unraveled through a puzzle about what properties belong to two things individually versus to both together.
The dialogue matters because it is one of the clearest demonstrations in the Platonic corpus of the Socratic method's purpose: not to hand over a doctrine but to expose how difficult it is to state, with logical rigor, what everyone assumes they already understand. It ends without an answer, only the shared admission, via a proverb, that "beautiful things are hard." It is also a character study of the sophistic mindset (Hippias's contempt for verbal precision, his boasting about fees) set against Socratic persistence, and it anticipates the search for a Form of Beauty that appears more constructively in dialogues like the Symposium and Phaedrus.
“The truth is, Socrates - mark this well, if I'm to speak plainly - a beautiful young woman is a fine thing.”
— Hippias Major · read this chapter →
“the finest of monkeys is ugly compared to the human race, and the finest of pots is ugly compared to the race of young women”
— Hippias Major · read this chapter →
“didn't he also make the whites of the eyes out of ivory, but used stone instead - finding a stone as close to ivory in color as he could?”
— Hippias Major · read this chapter →
“neither would the good be beautiful nor the beautiful good, if each of them really is something different from the other”
— Hippias Major · read this chapter →
“I think I now know what the proverb means — that beautiful things are hard.”
— Hippias Major · read this chapter →
It is a Socratic dialogue devoted to a single question: what is the beautiful (to kalon) itself? Socrates and the sophist Hippias of Elis try out several definitions — a beautiful girl, gold, fitness, usefulness, beneficial pleasure — and Socrates refutes each in turn. The dialogue ends unresolved, with both speakers agreeing that beautiful things are hard to define.
Hippias of Elis is a famous, wealthy sophist and diplomat who boasts of earning huge fees teaching young men across Greece, including over 150 minas from a single trip to Sicily. He is portrayed as confident and practical but unable to give a rigorous definition of beauty when pressed by Socrates.
No. Every proposal — a beautiful woman, gold, the fitting, the useful, the beneficial, and pleasure through sight and hearing — is tested and rejected through logical counterexamples. The dialogue ends with Socrates saying he has learned only that 'beautiful things are hard,' quoting a proverb.
He points out that the sculptor Pheidias, universally agreed to be a good craftsman, made Athena's statue with ivory and stone rather than gold throughout, and that a plain fig-wood ladle is more fitting (and by Hippias's own logic more beautiful) for stirring porridge than a golden one that would shatter the pot.
Socrates argues that the beneficial is what produces something good, making it a cause; but a cause and its effect are necessarily distinct (a father cannot be his own son), so if the beautiful is the cause of the good, the beautiful cannot simply be identical with the good itself.
Socrates raises a puzzle about whether a property shared by two things together must also belong to each one individually. Since the pleasure of sight and the pleasure of hearing are each beautiful only in combination with the other kind of pleasure, not test the beauty in each pleasure taken alone, the definition collapses under the same together/individually distinction used earlier in the argument.
Alcibiades 1 · Alcibiades 2 · Apology · Charmides · Cleitophon · Cratylus · Critias · Crito · Epinomis · Euthydemus · Euthyphro · Gorgias