Σ Scriptorium Press · Reader's Guides

Homily on Jeremiah 20

Origen's sermon on Jeremiah 20:7 ('You deceived me, Lord, and I was deceived'), defending God's anger, repentance, and 'deception' as homonyms of human emotion.

📖 Read the full translation — free 🎧 Free audiobook 📚 Plain full text

What it is

Homily on Jeremiah 20 is a sermon Origen preached on the opening of Jeremiah's twentieth chapter, where the prophet cries out to God, "You deceived me, Lord, and I was deceived." The verse is theologically awkward on its face, since it seems to accuse God of lying, and Origen builds the whole homily around defusing that difficulty. His method is to argue that Scripture routinely applies to God words that describe human passions -- wrath, anger, repentance, deception -- but that these words are homonyms: they share a name with the human emotion while pointing to a completely different reality, one that is always corrective and purposeful rather than irrational or culpable.

Origen works through a chain of examples before reaching deception itself. God's wrath disciplines where his word alone fails to reach; God's anger seeks to turn the rebuked person back; God's repentance, such as his regret at having made Saul king, is not weakness but the fitting response to changed circumstances, and it clears the way for David. Having established the pattern, Origen turns to a story he says he received from a Hebrew source, transmitted to him by a convert who had fled to Origen's community for the sake of faith in Christ: God does not rule by force but by persuasion, wanting obedience to be voluntary rather than compelled, citing Paul's language to Philemon about Onesimus's good deed being freely given rather than exacted. On this reading, God's 'deception' of Jeremiah lay in commissioning him to carry a cup of judgment first to the nations and only last, and less harshly, to Israel -- letting Jeremiah believe Israel would be spared the worst, which shaped how the prophet delivered the message. The homily closes by reading Jeremiah's suffering as a type of Christ, applying the language of being surrounded and persecuted, and 'the Lord' who tests hearts and kidneys, to the Passion, and it ends with a meditation on the terror of being searched by the Word himself rather than by lesser tormentors. It matters as a compact example of Origen's exegetical technique: rescue a scandalous biblical anthropomorphism by relocating its meaning, use non-Christian tradition as supporting testimony, and pivot from Old Testament narrative to Christology.

Major themes

Key passages, in our translation

“Everything written concerning God, even if it seems on its face to be unfitting, must be understood as worthy of a good God.”

— Homily on Jeremiah 20 · read this chapter →

“God does not play the tyrant, but reigns as king, and in reigning he does not use force, but persuades, and wishes those under him to offer”

— Homily on Jeremiah 20 · read this chapter →

“so that your good deed might not be by compulsion but voluntary”

— Homily on Jeremiah 20 · read this chapter →

“things are homonymous when only the name is common, while the account corresponding to the name belongs to a different reality”

— Homily on Jeremiah 20 · read this chapter →

“Therefore let us rise up and ask for help”

— Homily on Jeremiah 20 · read this chapter →

Questions readers ask

What is Origen's Homily on Jeremiah 20 about?

It is a sermon on Jeremiah 20:7, 'You deceived me, Lord, and I was deceived,' in which Origen defends God against the charge of lying by arguing that biblical words for divine wrath, repentance, and deception only share a name with human emotions, not their nature.

How does Origen explain God 'deceiving' Jeremiah?

Origen relates a tradition, which he says he received from a convert to Christ, that God let Jeremiah believe the nations would be judged first and Israel spared the harshest sentence, so that Jeremiah would deliver the message as God intended rather than resisting it.

Does Origen think God actually gets angry or regretful?

No. He argues these terms are homonymous: God's wrath, anger, and repentance look like human passions in name only, and in reality are always corrective, aimed at turning the sinner back, as with God's regret over making Saul king.

What does Origen say about voluntary versus compelled obedience?

He argues God could force good behavior on people but chooses not to, wanting virtue done voluntarily; he supports this by citing Paul's letter to Philemon, where Onesimus's good deed is described as freely given, not compelled.

How does the homily connect Jeremiah to Jesus?

Origen reads verses describing Jeremiah being surrounded, pursued, and unable to be overcome by his persecutors as also applying to Christ's persecution by those who pursued him, and treats 'the Lord who examines hearts and kidneys' as a Christological title as well.

Cite this translation: Origen, Homily on Jeremiah 20, translated by Scriptorium Press (2026), scriptorium-press.pages.dev.
All Scriptorium Press translations are free to read, quote, and share; they are original 2026 translations made directly from the source language.

More from this library

Commentary on John, Book 1 · Commentary on John, Book 10 · Commentary on John, Book 2 · Commentary on John, Book 4 · Commentary on John, Book 5 · Commentary on John, Book 6 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 10 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 11 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 12 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 13 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 14 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 15

← All reader's guides