Origen's homily on Jeremiah 2, arguing God did not create sin or death and reading the prophet's soda/soapwort/fire imagery as degrees of purification for the sinning soul.
This is the second homily in Origen's series on Jeremiah, preached to a congregation and moving verse by verse through the opening of Jeremiah chapter 2. Origen opens by insisting, against any dualist reading, that God did not make death or delight in destruction: everything God made was made for existence and health, and death entered the world only through the devil's envy. Human wickedness, he argues, is self-created — God made every soul "sound of foot," and it is the soul's own turning away that produces sin, just as the prophet's vine, planted "wholly true," turned itself to bitterness and became an "alien vine."
The bulk of the homily is an extended allegorical reading of Jeremiah's image of washing with soda (niter) and soapwort. Origen rejects a literal reading — no one imagines an actual detergent removes actual sin — and instead treats niter and soapwort as figures for different kinds of scripture or teaching that can cleanse different grades of sin. Some sins are healed by a poultice or oil (gentler correction), others need a bandage, and still others are not comparable to ordinary filth at all: for these, no washing suffices, only "the spirit of burning."
That distinction lets Origen build his most distinctive argument: Jesus baptizes "with the Holy Spirit and fire," but not the same person with both at once. The one already made worthy receives the Holy Spirit; the one who sins again after belief must instead pass through a purifying fire. Citing Isaiah's rod and flower from the root of Jesse, and Paul's image of the fire that tests wood, hay, and stubble, Origen frames this fire not as final destruction but as a corrective ordeal that can still lead to "another resurrection" for those saved through it, provided they prepare their works before death. The homily closes by urging the congregation to gather up these scriptural words, live by them, and take confidence in God's mercy through Christ.
“God did not make death, nor does he delight in the destruction of the living; for he created all things to exist, and the generative processes of the world are health-giving”
— Homily on Jeremiah 2 · read this chapter →
“But I planted you as a fruit-bearing vine, wholly" true—not true in part, nor true in one part and false in another”
— Homily on Jeremiah 2 · read this chapter →
“For living is the word of God, and active, keener than every two-edged blade.”
— Homily on Jeremiah 2 · read this chapter →
“we, the many, if we sin worse, need not niter, nor the multiplying of soapwort, but the spirit of burning.”
— Homily on Jeremiah 2 · read this chapter →
“"The rod" refers to those being punished, "the flower" to the righteous. Thus "God is a consuming fire," and "God is light": a consuming fire to sinners, light to the righteous and holy.”
— Homily on Jeremiah 2 · read this chapter →
It is Origen's sermon on the opening verses of Jeremiah chapter 2, arguing that God did not create death or sin and then allegorizing Jeremiah's image of washing with soda and soapwort as different strengths of scriptural teaching suited to different grades of sin.
He opens the homily insisting that God made all things to exist and be healthy, and that death entered the world through the devil's envy rather than through God's creative act; human sin is likewise self-inflicted, not God-made.
Origen treats Jeremiah's literal washing agents, soda (niter) and soapwort, as figures for words or teachings of scripture that cleanse sin, with different sins requiring different remedies just as different wounds need a poultice, oil, or a bandage.
He argues Jesus does not baptize the same person with both at once: the one found worthy receives the Holy Spirit, while a believer who sins again afterward must instead pass through a purifying fire that tests their works like wood, hay, and stubble.
No — he presents the purifying fire as corrective rather than simply destructive, holding out the possibility of being saved "in another resurrection" for those who pass through it, provided they prepare their works before death.
Commentary on John, Book 1 · Commentary on John, Book 10 · Commentary on John, Book 2 · Commentary on John, Book 4 · Commentary on John, Book 5 · Commentary on John, Book 6 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 10 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 11 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 12 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 13 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 14 · Commentary on Matthew, Book 15