Plutarch's essay-letter on how a young person should read poetry critically, taking its pleasures while guarding against its lies and immoral models.
How the Young Should Listen to Poetry (in Latin, Quomodo Adolescens Poetas Audire Debeat) is a short essay Plutarch addresses to his friend Marcus Sedatus, offering guidance on how boys such as Plutarch's own son Soclarus and Sedatus's son Cleander should be taught to read Homer, Euripides, Menander, and other poets. Plutarch does not want poetry banned from a young person's education, but he insists it needs a guide, because poetry mixes real pleasure with real danger the way an octopus's head is tasty but induces troubled sleep, or the way Egyptian drugs can heal or harm depending on the hand that mixes them.
The essay works through several practical rules. Because poets lie a great deal, sometimes to please an audience and sometimes because they actually believe false things about gods and the afterlife, the young reader must be trained to recognize which passages are invention, which reflect the poet's sincere but mistaken opinion, and which carry moral warnings embedded in the outcome of the story. Plutarch compares poetry to painting: both are arts of imitation, and imitation can be judged as skillful likeness quite apart from whether the thing depicted is admirable, the way a convincingly painted lizard or Thersites' ugly face can be praised for accuracy while the subject itself stays repulsive. He gives close readings of Homer's gods, of tragic characters like Achilles and Agamemnon, and of Menander's prologue for the Thais, showing students how to notice a poet's own signals of disapproval and how bad behavior in verse is usually attached to bad or foolish characters as a kind of built-in caution.
The essay closes by treating poetry as a bridge into philosophy rather than its rival: because good poets often embed genuinely philosophical sentiments about wealth, virtue, and death inside their verses, a young person who has already absorbed these ideas through Homer or Euripides arrives at philosophy less shocked and more receptive, softened toward its harder truths in advance. The work matters as one of antiquity's clearest statements of literary criticism as moral pedagogy, useful both to historians of ancient education and to anyone thinking about how to teach children to engage critically with fiction.
“In the octopus's head there is something bad, and also something good: it is that while it is most pleasant to eat, it produces troubled sleep, filling one with turbulent and strange visions, so they say.”
— Quomodo Adolescens Poetas Audire Debeat · read this chapter →
“First, then, the young person must be brought to the poems having nothing so well-rehearsed and ready at hand as the saying, "the singers lie about many things," partly willingly and partly unwillingly.”
— Quomodo Adolescens Poetas Audire Debeat · read this chapter →
“We will make him still more attentive by explaining to him, as we bring him to the poems, that the poetic art is an art of imitation and a power the counterpart of painting.”
— Quomodo Adolescens Poetas Audire Debeat · read this chapter →
“For in its essence what is ugly cannot become beautiful; but the imitation, whether it achieves its likeness in dealing with something base or with something good, is praised.”
— Quomodo Adolescens Poetas Audire Debeat · read this chapter →
“For these reasons, then, and because of everything said before, the young man needs good guidance in his reading, so that, rather than being prejudiced beforehand, he may instead be prepared in advance”
— Quomodo Adolescens Poetas Audire Debeat · read this chapter →
It is a Plutarch essay addressed to his friend Marcus Sedatus, giving practical advice for teaching boys (Plutarch's son Soclarus and Sedatus's son Cleander) how to read poets like Homer and Euripides critically rather than either banning poetry outright or absorbing it uncritically. Plutarch treats poetry as pleasurable but potentially dangerous, requiring guided reading.
No. He says it is 'neither possible nor beneficial' to keep a young person away from poems entirely, and instead argues for close supervision and guided interpretation, comparing the need for a guide in reading to needing a guide on the road.
He invokes the saying that poetry is speaking painting and painting is silent poetry, then argues that both arts can be judged for skillful imitation independent of whether the subject imitated is admirable, citing painted lizards, apes, and the ugly Thersites as examples praised for likeness rather than beauty.
He distinguishes lies told deliberately for pleasure and effect from cases where poets actually believed false things (such as some of Homer's statements about Zeus) and unintentionally passed those errors on to readers as if they were true.
Plutarch argues that poetic maxims about wealth, virtue, and death already resemble philosophical doctrines, so a young reader who absorbs them through Homer, Euripides, or Bacchylides arrives at philosophy already receptive rather than shocked by its harder claims.
Moralia: Ad Principem Ineruditum · Moralia: Adversus Colotem · Moralia: Amatoriae Narrationes · Moralia: Amatorius · Moralia: An Recte Dictum Sit Latenter Esse Vivendum · Moralia: An Seni Respublica Gerenda Sit · Moralia: An Virtus Doceri Possit · Moralia: An Vitiositas Ad Infelicitatem Sufficia · Moralia: Animine An Corporis Affectiones Sint Piores · Moralia: Apophthegmata Laconica · Moralia: Aquane An Ignis Sit Utilior · Moralia: Bruta Animalia Ratione Uti