A dialogue set at Delphi asking why the Pythia now prophesies in plain prose instead of verse, and whether the god or nature causes the change.
De Pythiae Oraculis ("On the Pythian Responses," also called "Why the Pythia No Longer Prophesies in Verse") is one of the Delphic dialogues in Plutarch's Moralia. Philinus narrates a tour of Delphi's votive offerings to Basilocles, recounting a conversation among a group that includes Plutarch's teacher Theon, the poet Sarapion, the geometer-turned-Epicurean Boethus, the young Diogenianus, and an unnamed visiting stranger. The framing device is a walk past statues and dedications, each of which triggers a digression: the odd blue-black color of Delphi's Corinthian bronze, the crumbling of Hiero's statue on the day he died, the fate of Lysander's monuments, and the legend of the Sibyl.
The central philosophical question, raised by Diogenianus, is why the oracles delivered by the Pythia used to come in ornate hexameter verse but now come in ordinary prose. Sarapion at first defends the beauty of the old verse oracles against Boethus's charge that they were metrically clumsy; Theon then reframes the whole debate, arguing that it was never the god who composed the verses at all, only the prophetess speaking under inspiration in her own natural idiom and vocabulary. The god supplies only "the origin of the motion" and a vision of the future; the words, meter, and style belong to the human medium. This lets Theon explain the shift to prose as a change in circumstances and personnel at Delphi, not a change in the god's nature -- once the practice of employing poetically trained prophetesses lapsed, oracles came out in the plain speech of whichever priestess happened to be inspired.
The dialogue closes with an encomium on the Pythia's current straightforwardness: her prose oracles "make no bend, no circuit, no duplicity, and no ambiguity," and Delphi's contemporary prosperity and rebuilding (credited partly to Roman-era patrons) is offered as evidence the god has not abandoned the shrine, merely changed the manner of its speech. The essay matters as a rare firsthand snapshot of second-century Delphi as a functioning, still-visited oracle, and as an early theory of religious inspiration that separates divine content from human linguistic form -- an idea with obvious relevance to later debates about prophecy and scriptural language generally.
“the god is a leader of the Muses, and it is no less fitting for him to excel in what is called eloquence than in tunefulness of melody and song”
— De Pythiae Oraculis · read this chapter →
“the voice is not the god's, nor the sound, nor the diction, nor the meter, but the woman's”
— De Pythiae Oraculis · read this chapter →
“the Sibyl, 'with raving mouth,' as Heraclitus says, 'uttering things mirthless and unadorned and unperfumed, reaches over a thousand years with her voice, because of the god.'”
— De Pythiae Oraculis · read this chapter →
“the Pythia's manner of speech, just as mathematicians call a straight line the shortest of all lines having the same endpoints, likewise makes no bend, no circuit, no duplicity, and no ambiguity, but goes straight toward the truth”
— De Pythiae Oraculis · read this chapter →
“it cannot be otherwise than that so great and so vast a change in so short a time has come about through human diligence alone, without a god being present here and joining in the divine work of the oracle”
— De Pythiae Oraculis · read this chapter →
It is a Delphic dialogue about why the Pythia's oracles used to be delivered in poetic verse but by Plutarch's time came in plain prose. A group touring Delphi's monuments debates whether this reflects a change in the god or simply a change in the human prophetesses who channel him.
No. Through the character Theon, Plutarch argues the god only supplies the originating impulse and a vision of the future; the actual wording, meter, and style come from the individual prophetess's own nature and training, which is why oracular verse could be clumsy without discrediting the god.
The frame narrator Philinus reports a conversation to Basilocles among Theon (Plutarch's teacher), the poet Sarapion, the Epicurean-leaning Boethus, the young Diogenianus, and an unnamed visiting stranger, as they walk among Delphi's votive statues.
The Sibyl is discussed as a legendary counterpart to the Pythia: a prophetess said to keep speaking even after death, her raw, unadorned utterances offered as an example of inspired speech that needs no poetic polish to carry truth.
The characters are physically touring Delphi's dedications, and several -- like a bronze statue of Hiero that collapsed the day he died -- prompt a side debate about whether such coincidences prove divine involvement in the physical world or are just chance, which mirrors the main argument about the oracle's words.
It ends on an optimistic note, pointing to new building, restored ruins, and general prosperity at Delphi as evidence that the oracle and its associated worship were flourishing rather than in decline in Plutarch's day.
Moralia: Ad Principem Ineruditum · Moralia: Adversus Colotem · Moralia: Amatoriae Narrationes · Moralia: Amatorius · Moralia: An Recte Dictum Sit Latenter Esse Vivendum · Moralia: An Seni Respublica Gerenda Sit · Moralia: An Virtus Doceri Possit · Moralia: An Vitiositas Ad Infelicitatem Sufficia · Moralia: Animine An Corporis Affectiones Sint Piores · Moralia: Apophthegmata Laconica · Moralia: Aquane An Ignis Sit Utilior · Moralia: Bruta Animalia Ratione Uti