Σ Scriptorium Press · Reader's Guides

Moralia: De Fortuna

A short Plutarch essay arguing that practical wisdom (phronesis), not blind Fortune, governs human affairs and makes external goods usable at all.

📖 Read the full translation — free 🎧 Free audiobook 📚 Plain full text

What it is

De Fortuna ("On Fortune") is a brief declamation from Plutarch's Moralia that attacks the popular saying "Fortune, not good counsel, governs the affairs of mortals." Plutarch treats the claim as self-refuting: if fortune rather than judgment explains why Aristides stayed poor or Scipio refused Carthage's spoils, it must equally explain theft, licentiousness, and every vice, which empties self-control and justice of meaning. He insists that what looks like luck is really practical wisdom (phronesis) operating under different names -- called self-control amid pleasures, courage amid danger, justice in civic life.

The essay's central move is a comparison between humans and animals. Nature armed beasts with horns, hooves, scales, and speed, leaving man 'naked and unarmed and unshod and unbedded,' yet man tames the horse, hunts the elephant, and turns bees and cattle to his use through reasoning and craft, not chance. Plutarch surveys the arts -- painting, music, cookery, fulling, even a child learning to dress -- as domains where practitioners deliberately exclude randomness with rules, measures, and plumb-lines, conceding only one famous exception: the painter Nealkes, unable to render a horse's foaming bit, hurled a paint-soaked sponge at the panel and the accidental splash succeeded where his skill had failed.

Plutarch's point in closing is that wealth, health, beauty, and reputation are inert until practical wisdom puts them to use, citing the general Iphicrates's answer to a taunt about his rank: 'I am the one who commands and makes use of all of these.' Fortune without wisdom is not a blessing but a trap, since 'faring fortunately beyond one's desert becomes, for those who lack practical wisdom, an occasion for acting ill.' The essay matters as a compact statement of Plutarch's ethical psychology: virtue is a single underlying judgment that takes different names in different circumstances, and no amount of external luck substitutes for it.

Major themes

Key passages, in our translation

“"Fortune, not good counsel, governs the affairs of mortals."”

— De Fortuna · read this chapter →

“only man, according to Plato, has been left by nature "naked and unarmed and unshod and unbedded."”

— De Fortuna · read this chapter →

“finally, in anger, he threw at the panel the sponge, just as it was, full of paints, and its impact wondrously reproduced the effect and achieved just what was needed.”

— De Fortuna · read this chapter →

“And he replied, "I am the one who commands and makes use of all of these."”

— De Fortuna · read this chapter →

“faring fortunately beyond one's desert becomes, for those who lack practical wisdom, an occasion for acting ill.”

— De Fortuna · read this chapter →

Questions readers ask

What is Plutarch's De Fortuna about?

It is a short essay arguing against the popular idea that fortune, not good judgment, governs human life. Plutarch says that what looks like luck in virtuous men -- such as Aristides staying poor or Scipio refusing plunder -- is really practical wisdom, and that crediting fortune for good conduct would just as absurdly credit it for vice.

What is the story about the painter Nealkes in De Fortuna?

Nealkes could not paint the foam around a horse's bit correctly despite many tries, so in frustration he threw a paint-soaked sponge at the panel, and the accidental splash produced exactly the effect he wanted. Plutarch offers this as the one genuine case of fortune helping an art, precisely because deliberate skill otherwise excludes chance.

What does Plutarch say practical wisdom actually is?

He argues it is not any specific possession -- not gold, health, or beauty -- but the capacity that makes good use of all of those things. Without it, he says, wealth and status become 'hard to use and unfruitful and harmful' to their owner.

Who was Iphicrates and why does Plutarch mention him?

Iphicrates was an Athenian general asked mockingly what military role he held, since he was neither a heavy infantryman, archer, nor peltast. His reply -- 'I am the one who commands and makes use of all of these' -- illustrates Plutarch's point that practical wisdom is the faculty that directs and uses other goods, not one of the goods itself.

How does Plutarch use animals to argue against fortune?

He notes that nature armed most animals with horns, claws, or speed while leaving man 'naked and unarmed,' yet humans use reasoning to tame horses, employ dogs, and even train elephants to dance -- proof, he says, that mastery over the world comes from practical wisdom, not chance.

Cite this translation: Plutarch, Moralia: De Fortuna, translated by Scriptorium Press (2026), scriptorium-press.pages.dev.
All Scriptorium Press translations are free to read, quote, and share; they are original 2026 translations made directly from the source language.

More from this library

Moralia: Ad Principem Ineruditum · Moralia: Adversus Colotem · Moralia: Amatoriae Narrationes · Moralia: Amatorius · Moralia: An Recte Dictum Sit Latenter Esse Vivendum · Moralia: An Seni Respublica Gerenda Sit · Moralia: An Virtus Doceri Possit · Moralia: An Vitiositas Ad Infelicitatem Sufficia · Moralia: Animine An Corporis Affectiones Sint Piores · Moralia: Apophthegmata Laconica · Moralia: Aquane An Ignis Sit Utilior · Moralia: Bruta Animalia Ratione Uti

← All reader's guides